-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix gaussian integral #46
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #46 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.01% 93.97% +0.96%
==========================================
Files 18 18
Lines 1031 1046 +15
==========================================
+ Hits 959 983 +24
+ Misses 72 63 -9 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Thank you for the fast implementation! Looks good to me :) |
@@ -90,7 +90,19 @@ function fourier_filter(arr, fct=window_gaussian; kwargs...) | |||
return fourier_filter!(copy(arr), fct; kwargs...) | |||
end | |||
|
|||
function fourier_filter_by_1D_FT!(arr::TA, wins::AbstractVector; transform_win=false, dims=(1:ndims(arr))) where {N, TA <: AbstractArray{<:Complex, N}} | |||
""" | |||
fourier_filter_by_1D_FT!(arr::TA, wins::AbstractVector; transform_win=false, normalize_win=false, dims=(1:ndims(arr))) where {N, TA <: AbstractArray{<:Complex, N}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe transform_win
and normalize_win
.
I think being more verbose would be better here since win
is confusing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry. Don't understand your comment. It is called "normalize_win" and you suggest the same?
We should definitely not change transform_win to stay backwards compatible. So I agree that "win" should be more verbose but consistency is also important.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok didn't see this was already in the old version
wins[d] | ||
if (normalize_win) | ||
if (wins[d][1] != 0 && wins[d][1] != 1) | ||
wins[d] ./ wins[d][1] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this line is not covered by tests
+`normalize_win`: specifies whether the directional windows (after potential FFT) each need to be normalized to a value of 1 at the zero frequency coordinate. | ||
+`dims`: the dimensions to apply this separable multiplication to. If empty, the array will not be filtered. | ||
""" | ||
function fourier_filter_by_1D_RFT!(arr::TA, wins::AbstractVector; dims=(1:ndims(arr)), transform_win=false, normalize_win=false, kwargs...) where {T<:Real, N, TA<:AbstractArray{T, N}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
windows
instead of wins
fixed a bug with the normalization of Gaussian filtering. Added some tests, which also test the previously buggy case of zero-integral arrays.